SABBATH

God's Gift to Us
EmailPrinter version


commentary: Why Liberals Love Illegals (Part Four)

Hiding The Enemy
John W. Ritenbaugh
Given 03-Jul-10; Sermon #1000c; 12 minutes

Description: (show)

John Ritenbaugh, continuing in the series "Why liberals love illegals," reiterates that demonic influence seems to be guiding the ill-conceived decisions courting the favor of Islamic extremists, with the Attorney General Holder absolutely forbidding "profiling" of radical Islam, totally ignoring the motivation behind the Fort Hood Massacre and the abortive Christmas Day Underwear bombing. The Obama Administration forbids the characterization of "Islamic Terrorism" even when Hassan, the perpetrator, describes himself as a son of Allah.

Topics: (show)

May 13, 2010 Ford Hood Massacre Attorney General Holder Axis of evil Bobby Kennedy Fort Hood Massacre Jeremiah 9:6-7 Israeli murders in Munich Pan Am Flight Pentagon Representative Smith Spain TWA 847 World Trade Center




This is the fourth in a series of commentaries on why liberals love illegals, but in reality, it's a spin off from that one in which I concluded regarding the dumb decisions that are being made by the administration these days that that was the result of demon influence. I did not mean, of course, that those men were demon possessed. I did mean that they were being influenced for the time being, anyway, because God has allowed the demons to gain the upper hand.

I hope that you will remember that I am neither pro-Republican nor pro-George Bush. I am pro-Jesus Christ and pro-Kingdom of God, which is where my citizenship and therefore my sympathies reside. I hope that you will understand that my commentaries are intended to reflect the utter weaknesses of any humanly devised system.

That being said, for whatever the reasons, there exists a clear line of demarcation between George Bush and his administration and Obama and his administration that is shown by comparing the verbiage of the two administrations whenever speaking of radical Islam. This came to mind earlier this week when I received an email (for the second time) drawing one's attention to the indisputable conclusion that:

» Bobby Kennedy was murdered by a Muslim extremist between the ages of seventeen and forty.

» The 1972 murders of Israeli Olympic athletes in Munich was perpetrated by Muslim men between the ages of seventeen and forty.

» The United States Embassy in Iran was taken over by radical Muslims between the ages of seventeen and forty.

» TWA flight 847 was hijacked by Muslim radicals between the ages of seventeen and forty.

» Pan Am flight 103 was bombed, and its passengers all killed, by Muslim men between the ages of seventeen and forty.

» In 1993, the World Trade Center was bombed by Muslim men between the ages of seventeen and forty.

» The United States embassies in Kenya and Tanzania were bombed by Muslim radicals between the ages of seventeen and forty.

» The World Trade Center and the Pentagon were bombed by Muslim men between the ages of seventeen and forty, using four airliners.

» American newsman Daniel Pearl was kidnapped and murdered by Muslim men between the ages of seventeen and forty.

» The Spanish railway system was bombed by Muslim men between the ages of seventeen and forty.

» The London railway system was bombed by Muslim men between the ages of seventeen and forty.

» Enough liquid explosives to bomb between ten and twenty commercial airliners was discovered and captured from radical Muslims between the ages of seventeen and forty.

In every case, the perpetrators of these things were Muslim men between the ages of seventeen and forty. Despite all the evidence, the administration will permit no formal profiling by an American law enforcement group, be they local, state, or federal.

The most recent public denial of the radical Muslims' danger to life and liberty of American citizens took place only a month and a half ago—May 13—in Congress during a congressional investigation into the Fort Hood shooting by Major Nidal Malik Hasan, the Times Square attacker, and the Christmas Day bomber. Now listen to this dialogue that took place in Congress on May 13. The person being questioned is American Attorney General Eric Holder, who is the very top prosecutor of the Justice Department of the United States of America. It is his responsibility to prosecute those who break the law in the United States. This dialogue is reported by syndicated columnist Charles Krauthammer in The Charlotte Observer this morning.

Representative Lamar Smith, Republican of Texas, asked this question: "Do you feel that these individuals might have been incited to take the actions they did because of radical Islam?" Attorney General Eric Holder replied, "There are a variety of reasons why I think people have taken these actions." [Good political answer.] Smith came right back, "But radical Islam could have been one of the reasons?" Attorney General Holder said, "There are a variety of reasons why people boom." Smith came right back and broke in, asking the same question. Holder said, "There are plenty of reasons why people do these things. Some of them are potentially religious-based."

Krauthammer reports that this kind of exchange went on until representative Smith finally gave up in exasperation.

All of this, despite the fact that the Times Square attacker has already pleaded guilty and he has openly brag to authorities that he considers himself a Muslim soldier. In addition, Hasan, the Fort Hood shooter, printed business card identifies him as a "SoA," which means, "Son of Allah."

I mentioned earlier the difference between George Bush's administration and Barack Obama's in this regard. Bush at least consistently referred to radical Islam as the axis of evil. Obama's administration refers to them as "a loose network of violent extremists." This is an absurd refusal to acknowledge who is trying to kill American citizens and why. Calling them the enemy is, in fact, officially banned by this administration from its vocabulary, along with the terms "jihadist," "Islamist," and "Islamic terrorism." They are not to be identified by anybody representing the administration.

"Know your enemy" is the primary responsibility for those who are involved in warfare. What would it be like, brethren, if we were unable to identify Satan as such? God calls him the adversary, the destroyer, the accuser of the brethren, the liar, and so on.

The Pentagon's report on the Fort Hood shooter is 86 pages long. There is not a single mention of Hasan's Islamism To deny truth only leads to ever-expanding absurdities, and it is a direct denial of truth about a man who went down—died—shouting, "Allahu Ahkbar" as he killed twelve Americans. Is it any wonder that God reports that we are sick from the top of our head through the soles of our feet?

Listen to me as I read to you Jeremiah 9:1-6. It begins with Jeremiah speaking. Put yourself in Jeremiah shoes, considering the news that we are getting in this nation:

Jeremiah 9:1-6 Oh, that my head were waters, and my eyes a fountain of tears, that I might weep day and night for the slain of the daughter of my people! Oh, that I had in the wilderness—a lodging place for travelers; that I might leave my people, and go from them! For they are all adulterers, an assembly of treacherous men. And like their bow they have bent their tongues for lies. They are not valiant for the truth on the earth. For they proceed from evil to evil, and they do not know Me,” says the LORD. Everyone take heed to his neighbor, and do not trust any brother; for every brother will utterly supplant, and every neighbor will walk with slanderers. Everyone will deceive his neighbor, and will not speak the truth; they have taught their tongue to speak lies; they weary themselves to commit iniquity. Your dwelling place is in the midst of deceit; through deceit they refuse to know Me,” says the LORD.

In today's news, we are showing ourselves to be a nation seemingly afraid to face the truth.

JWR/aws/dcg

Back to the top