![]() | |||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
I do not know whether it is the most dominating character trait of human nature's self-centeredness, but I am pretty sure that competitiveness is very high on the list, and by this drive very much of the level of the peaceful and harmonious quality and activities of life is disturbed. The American Heritage Dictionary states that to compete is "to strive with another or others to obtain a goal." The American Webster Online Dictionary defines "competitive" (the adjective form) as "inclined, desiring, or suited to compete." I think Wikipedia gives the best one. It defines competition (the noun form) as "a contest between individuals, groups, nations, animals, etc., for territory, a niche, or a location of resources; it arises whenever two or more parties strive for a goal which cannot be shared." A clear example of this last one is that not everybody can get first prize. It is one of those things that cannot be shared. Because we live in a badly divided world, Jesus gives us a head-up in Matthew 24's prophecy, warning us that as His return nears we would hear of wars and rumors of wars. And He thus indicates that as wars and rumors of wars have continued throughout time, there will be a noticeable increase of them as the time nears for His return. This is somewhat important to this sermon, because competition produces war. That is not the only thing it produces. It produces winners, but very often what happens is war is a result. Let us add another factor to this: coveting. Coveting—the breaking of the Tenth Commandment, combined with competition for the same object—is the cause of almost all of these wars, and as we are aware, much, much more besides. It causes divorce, which is war on a small scale waged between two people. Business is war that has been so proclaimed by many social critics. They perceive the giants of industry as cold-blooded moguls who move without feeling to maneuver and capture their business competitors and financial trap in order to gain a larger segment of the available wealth. I once read a book a number of years ago titled, "The Last of the Moguls." That was the theme of that book. The theme featured the business accomplishments and a brief overview of the business attitude of families like the Rockefellers, the DuPonts, the Kennedys, Mellon, Morgan, Vanderbilt, and several others besides. The book presented them as highly competitive and sometimes brutally cunning in business. Politics is highly competitive, and "politics is war," so says Von Clausewitz, a military strategy genius, who proclaimed that the deadly fighting in the fields of battle with weapons designed to maim and kill, is nothing more than politics removed from the negotiating table to the fields of bloody weaponry. In the Israelitish nation, the dominant economic model is capitalism, and the dominant motivation of capitalism is competition to create wealth. In capitalism, competition is perceived as good; without it the experts claim there would be no advancement in quality of life. In fact, the central theme of the theory of evolution is survival of the fittest, which is simply a euphemism for the continuation of life through competition; and therefore the species survive and is better because of the competition. In the area of athletics, the object is to defeat those who are striving for the same goal. In some cases the competition becomes so intense that the players will actually proclaim that in the field of playing—"It is war out there!" With my own ears I have heard people in NASCAR racing say, "If you ain't driving to cheat, you ain't winning either," which points out in a very simple way what the drive to compete and gain for the self has the potential to produce. It is not good, by a long shot, as one can see with one's own eyes about what has gone on in the past to the present. If competition is uncontrolled, fairness, equity, equality, partiality, integrity, and justice begin sliding right out the window, and then those less strongly competitive, and maybe less skilled and playing by the rules, are not on a level playing field. It is almost as if the rest have to run uphill against those who have the competitive edge, because humanly, unfairness, inequity, prejudice and bias, injustice, and favoritism have the opportunity to move right in. There is no doubt from whom the fire's competition is derived. The source is the spirit of Satan who is so competitive that he took on the Creator God to wrest rulership from Him. Competitiveness ultimately separates people from each other, and this day—the day of Atonement—is about how that is going to be resolved. I have even read where in sports that are pretty rough, like football, that some coaches find it distasteful when one of their athletes gets religion. And why? Because they begin to lose their edge of competitiveness—fire. Turn now with me to Ecclesiastes 4:4-5—a very interesting couple of scriptures.
Verse 4, here, is poorly translated in both the KJV and in the NKJV because the translators chose to translate two words literally rather than follow the imagery that rightly depicts how the words were used in actual practice by Hebrew-speaking people. The two words are "skillful" and "envy." Listen to how the Soncino, the Jewish Commentary, translates that verse: "Again, I considered all labor and all excelling in works, that it is a man's rivalry with his neighbor. This also is vanity and a striving after wind." Now here is how the Revised English Bible translates that verse: "I considered all toil and all achievement, and saw that it springs from rivalry between one person and another. This too is futility and a chasing after wind." Finally I am going to read this to you out of the Amplified Version. I think it makes it just about as clear as it can possibly be translated. "Then I saw that all painful effort in labor and all skill in work comes from man's rivalry with his neighbor. This is also vanity, a vain striving after the wind and a feeding on it." Solomon wrote this book late in his life, and thus his comments, which come so very close to absolute truth, are somewhat cynical. He had observed a great deal about life, and his observation is that the incentive to work is not the accomplishment of something truly worthwhile; it is in short a bad motivation, and life thus becomes rivalry-based rather than mutual cooperation-based, and the potential for producing bad fruit rises exceedingly with the rivalry. That is why God judges it as a vanity—something that is futile. On the other end of the scale, as the Hebrew people often did, is verse 5, which says, "The fool folds his hands and consumes his own flesh." It is telling us there that the indolent fool who does not appreciate the necessity to work hard at a livelihood is the same thing as folding his hands in lazy idleness when he should be up and about doing things, but instead he wastes his life away. Brethren, somewhere there is a balance between these two, because God reconciles things, and the observation Solomon made there was essentially correct, because man's rivalry and competiveness with one another is unchecked. It is free to do just about anything, and when it does, all kinds of imbalances begin to occur within a society. From here we are going to go to something that happened between Abraham and Lot recorded in Genesis 13, and it shows what a truly balanced Christian God-fearing man does in such a case.
We see that both wanted the same land. Not everybody can finish in first place is the situation here.
You might remember in I Corinthians 6 Paul said, "Why not just give it up? Instead of fighting, competing for whatever it is, why don't you just give it up?" Where do you think he got that idea? He got it out of Genesis 13, because that is what the "father of the faithful" did. So we have this episode here resulting from competition for the same grazing area. Now in the Interpreter's Commentary, Volume I, Pages 584 to 588, the commentator evaluates the pros and cons of competition. This commentator concludes at this point: "Note that there will always be two classes of men, and regarding them, every man needs to consider which one he is tending to belong to—the men like Lot or the men like Abraham. It is a distinction that every young man who first surveys his will and determines what kind of success he will aim at; it confronts every mature person in the return decisions where conscience would go one way, and the temptation to experiment in Sodom points the other." This incident in Genesis 13 is a very small incident in terms of all of the world's activities, and certainly small in terms of time. It gives insight though into a truism. It is the competitive struggle for gain that is at the heart of most of the conflicts of our time as well as it was in the time of Abraham and Lot. Now man is acquisitive, and that acquisitive impulse seems to be insatiable in many. It demands more and more, and it seemingly is never satisfied. The unconverted man, for the sake of his ego, desires to win, and if men do not compete for profit, they will compete for power or for prestige or for pleasure. The subject of competition and the struggles, including fighting and warfare that ensue, does not end here in Genesis as far as the Bible is concerned. The Interpreter's Commentary, Volume 11, Pages 440-442 has another entry, and it has an interesting thought within it. I want you to turn with me to I Timothy 5, verses 17 and 18.
Let us stop for just a minute. Paul is counseling Timothy that although he personally determined that he would not accept any wages for his labors in behalf of the church, he was most certainly not against other elders being paid for doing the same thing he offered freely. It is right here again that the commentator's comments are of interest. From the fact of what Jesus clearly stated in Luke 10:7 ("the workman deserves his wages") and from what Paul reinforces by quoting Deuteronomy 24:4 ("You shall not muzzle the ox that treads out the corn")—the commentator moves on to what he believes the social consequences would be if a nation would follow what appears to be the biblical program. Here is what he concluded that the Bible shows:
Before I make the next statement, understand that man hardly gets anything right out of the Bible. I believe that all three of these statements are right principles. His comments made me wonder what kind of system will be used in Christ's rule of the Earth that contains balancing incentives to serve and to produce at one and the same time. It forces me to ask this question. Is capitalism really a God-based system as modern Christianity seems to espouse it is right? There is no doubt that capitalism is able to produce wealth and spread it around in a fairly balanced way through the culture, but history also shows me that an evil side affect also intensifies competitive spirit in man, and with that it also produces disagreement, division, and war in a variety of levels and intensity. In other words, you cannot use a wrong system and produce good all around for everybody. We are going to turn now to Galatians, to another set of familiar scriptures. These are in Galatians 5:19-21. I am going to read these from the Amplified Version.
That is quite a listing. Please understand this. Most of you using the KJV and the NKJV have in it the word "work." The Amplified Version translated that either "doings" or "practices." "Work" gives one the impression that one has to labor to produce the characteristics that are listed in Galatians 5:17-19. That, brethren, is patently untrue! The flesh does these things by nature. It is natural to produce that kind of list of immoral behavior. The fight is to not do them. In the flesh we produce these characteristics naturally unless we make effort to stop the flesh from producing them. This is where the problem comes in for you and me, because God's overall purpose is clearly stated in John 17. It is oneness with His children. He wants His children to be just like Jesus Christ, and just like Christ is with Him. However, each and every one of these works, practices is a destructive barb that explosively, sometimes violently, separates people from each other, and most importantly from God. In my memory at preparing this sermon, one word in this group was what started what I am giving to you right now. It is the word "strife." In the KJV it is "variance." In the NKJV it is translated "contention." So we have here three synonyms for that Greek word it underlies: variance, contention, or strife. Now unless you have one of the newer Strong's concordances as I do, you might not find the Greek word used here and translated into three different synonyms, but my concordance says this: "The stress in this word is on rivalry [competition]." The way it is translated is what the rivalry produces. It produces variance, contention, warfare, separating people from one another. So the stress in this word is on rivalry. It points to what competition is and produces. It produces separation, variance, contentions and strife. It clearly produces division. Now Zodhiates adds another interesting sidebar to this word. He says that the antonym—the opposite for the Greek word translated as strife, contentions, or rivalry—is the Greek word which means "peace." All of these works that are listed here in verses 19 through 21, together clearly indicate why there is so much disagreement and division everywhere throughout all time, and that includes these things being in the church. This listing is simply the evidence that appears outwardly of the way of human nature, and it has been this way since the first sin—the one that created the original division of mankind from God and is a division that has never been healed. Now let us put a cap on this portion of the sermon by turning to Isaiah 59, where God, through Isaiah, gives us a pretty good rundown why the social system in this world, in the United States, is the way it is.
Look at the evidence I gave you—just four things that floated across my desk of how great the iniquities are in this country. And why are those iniquities there? Because we have no contact with God, and so we cannot judge righteous judgment, and so people are going to be treated unfairly wherever, and it looks like it is never going to end. Now sin, regardless of the intensity, always produces separation. The ultimate in separation is death, of which result Adam and Eve were warned. Sin separates one from God and fellowman. It is impossible for sin to create unity, except briefly, and in most cases that unity is made for further opportunities to sin together. The ways to sin and create division are not limited to those listed in Galatians 5:19. What Paul gave there is almost like a stalk list of evil conduct which quickly came to Paul's mind as he was writing in order to show a measure of contrast with the fruits of the spirit which follow. Adam and Eve were not only separated from God spiritually, but also physically. Now watch as I give you a quick overview of mankind's progress away from God and away from oneness with God and man. Now Cain, after Adam and Eve, did not treat Abel well, did he? How about Lamech, in the next chapter? He murdered a couple of men. By Genesis the 6th chapter the earth was filled with violence. God sent the Flood to calm things down, and after the Flood God again commanded the people to fill the earth and spread over it, but Nimrod was a Mighty Hunter against the Lord, and he, with the help of the people, became God's rival. He competed with God for the people's loyalty, and the people concentrated themselves in Babylon despite what God said. They too were at variance against God, and then God forcibly segregated them by confusing their language to keep them from unifying in rebellion. What did this produce for the Gentiles? What did they gain as a result of what they did? God wanted them to be taught by the descendents of Shem so that there would be contact with God, and most specifically from the family of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob. Turn with me to the book of Ephesians, chapter 2, verse 11. Paul was speaking directly to the Gentile Ephesians.
In doing what they did between the Tigris and the Euphrates rivers, they cut themselves off from contact with the teaching that God was going to give through Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, and so they were without Christ, having no hope, and without God in the world all because they were at variance with God. Let us turn to James 3:13-18.
Each of the characteristics James mentions in verses 14 and 16 is a sin, and they are sheer foolishness. Peace exists when people are at one. Brethren, peace is essential to salvation, and James shows that their sins produced confusion, tumult, and prejudice. Go now to James 4:1-5. To whom was James writing? He was writing to a church congregation, and he asked this question:
I recently read that the book of James was probably written and distributed in the mid AD 40s, and by the time James wrote this book much of the foolishness that we saw at the end of chapter 3 had already infiltrated into the church. It was brought into the church by its own membership, bringing it in from the world, and it was dividing the congregation in which the people were at war. Let us go to Leviticus 23:26-32.
In terms of meaning of each festival there are some parallels between Passover and the Day of Atonement, not in their specifics, but in their generality. Both portray the accomplishment of reconciliation, and the major difference is that Passover is very personal in its application, and Atonement (which of course has not been fulfilled) is worldwide in its application. We are observing, in one sense, what is the best known of God's festivals because of the Jews observance of it. However, on the other hand, along with the Last Great Day, it is the least understood, and partly because people are focused on the fasting that is commanded. The world in general tends to look at this day as a curiosity; however, the Jews, who understand its meaning somewhat better, observe it as the most solemn day of the year—a recognition of its significance that it surely deserves, and they at least have a sense that it has a very meaningful application, but they do not understand much of what those meanings are. Now for us, a festival is one that implies eating and drinking in its envivial atmosphere, but this day—the day of Atonement—is a festival without eating and drinking. There is a reason why people have trouble relating to this day. This day is the one above all others that Satan has driven to hide behind a smoke screen of mystifying silence. He would very much like to obliterate any knowledge of it, and he has almost succeeded. We are going to look at a major point regarding Israel's worship of God. Recall that Israel did have some contact with God. We are going to go first to Hosea, and we will be looking here in a way at how well Satan has obliterated true knowledge of God.
Incidentally, this charge is being made against them probably within the last forty years before Israel was defeated by Assyria and went into captivity.
If you want to, someday you can compare Hosea with Amos. They were written fairly close to one another. We find in the book of Amos though that the people were worshipping regularly, but they were not doing so with right and true knowledge, and here is God making the charge about the same period of time Amos was preaching that there was no knowledge of God in the land, and Amos reinforces that.
The people rejected truth, and that is why they did not have any true knowledge. It was not that God did not make it available. It was available. In another place God said that He sent prophet after prophet to tell them the truth, but they kept killing the prophets. They continued to be religious, they continued to have sacred services, but it was done without true knowledge. What had happened was, as they rejected God's prophets and therefore the truth of God, the people themselves had strung bits and pieces of truth together with paganism, and they thus created a toxic religious mixture that did not honor God one bit. If you would again study the other minor prophetic books like Amos, those books show that in spite of all the religious activity they were involved in, they were still separated from God. That is the Old Testament. Let us go to the New Testament, and we will find from Paul's writings that nothing had changed. Almost 700 years had gone by since the writing of Hosea to the writing of the book of Romans, and we find Paul says the following in Romans 10:1-3:
They rejected God's truth—God's right way of doing things. What did Jesus say to the Pharisees? "Full well you have rejected the commandments of God that you might keep your own tradition." It is everywhere which bears record against these people. They have a zeal for God. Now who better exemplifies that zeal than the Apostle Paul? He had a zeal for God; and in his misdirected zeal, that zeal so preoccupied his mind it drove him to perceive Christ and the Christians as enemies of the faith of his fathers. He was a primary example. If we fast-forward to this day, to 2,000 years later, we can look around Israel—this portion of it anyway here in the United States—and we have a land that is dotted with many church buildings. I believe that most of the people who are attending there are truly sincere in their act of worship, but a true knowledge of God is still lacking. The book of Romans reflects a belief of the Jews of their being incapable of justifying themselves before God on the basis of merit. Today's Israelites, by way of contrast, have gone completely in the other direction. Now just get the picture here. In Jesus' day and in Paul's day very many of the people were zealous in trying to keep the commandments as they understood them, but they perverted them, as with the Sabbath and so forth. But they were zealous in doing the keeping of law as they understood them, as they were taught of the Pharisees and the Sadducees, but they were at least zealous of law. Let us put it that way. Now what do we have today? The modern Israelites have swung the pendulum completely the other way, and now everything is grace, and [they say] you do not really have to pay attention to the law at all. Christ kept it for you. If He kept it for you, you do not need to worry about doing it, and yet there is still some measure of zeal for worshipping God. So great weight is put upon sincerity, and that is good. They are at least sincere in their own mind, and I believe that sincerity and their misguided understanding of what is required of them actually keeps them from committing the unpardonable sin, and so they are doing what they are doing in ignorance. That is why Paul said he was forgiven because what he did he did in ignorance. The people today are doing what they are doing in ignorance, and they are sincere. But if two people—God on this hand, and man on the other hand—God is following His way of life, and man is following his way of life that he is sincere about. You know very well that one of these days the path is going to part, and the sincerity will not move the person from his path over to God's path. It just will not happen. God says He is looking for people who worship Him in spirit and in truth. The sincerity that is exercised by these people is not in truth. Let us look at Romans 11, because there is another factor we have to put in here.
Paul is giving these people encouragement. These people are already in the church, and they needed to be encouraged about this, and so he says, "Look, you have been called. You have been chosen. You are part of the remnant." Drop down to verse 7. Now Paul looks backward again.
And brethren, it remains to this day. Reconciliation with God is still open to them. Atonement with God is open to them. David adds to what Paul was saying.
The table to which David was referring was not a literal table with food on it, but the spiritual table that has spiritual food on it. The spiritual food they were eating which was going into their mind and becoming part of their heart, part of their character, and what they were making decisions based upon, was largely paganism, and so their spiritual diet was destroying them. Now what is it that enables Satan to deceive mankind? Part of it we have already seen, and that is that God has lifted His mind, hand, finger, or whatever you want to say, to only work through a very small number of people—the remnant, the elect—and the rest He simply does not intervene in their lives to give them truth in such a way by means of His spirit so that they would understand. He just leaves them in their unconverted state so that later on, as we understand in the Last Great Day, they will have their opportunity for salvation. One of the things Paul is pointing out here is to give encouragement to those of us who are in the church that God has indeed given us an awesome gift that He has not given to very many people on this Earth, so Satan has that to work with. God simply has not intervened as He is going to do later on during the Millennium, and then on into the Last Great Day. So the people are already in a position in which there is some degree of blindness, and this has enabled Satan to deceive the whole world. We find in II Corinthians 4 there is even one more indication of what God has done.
The word "veiled" here is parallel to the word "stupor" which we read in Romans 11. Satan is not done with his work. He is working with people who are veiled, who are in somewhat of a stupor. I want you to go back to Genesis 3, verses 1 through 5 where we have one of these "firsts," and from it we can lift a gigantic principle that gives understanding. Listen to what Satan says. Think about what Satan says.
"I can be like God! All I have to do is eat this fruit, and I am benefited thereby." Satan put it before her, and the two of them (Adam and Eve) jumped at it. So what does this tell us? Genesis 3:1-5 provides substantiation that Satan deceives through a faulty and spotty education that contains just enough truth within it to make his misdirection seem plausible. He is a wonderful salesman, but the result was, in this case, a forcible separation from God which in turn has led to every horrible moral and spiritual degeneration. Adam and Eve were a test case and an example for all of mankind, and God determined, as is shown beginning in Romans 12:5, that as they responded, so would all of mankind. His judgment was correct. We have all sinned. We have no justification whatever for saying in our pride that we have not done so. God has all of mankind dead to right, including us, because all of us have rejected God's truth out of hand when confronted by it. Even now, even after having it revealed to us, we wrestle with it when our flesh or mind sets itself to defy the law and rule of God. One of the major lessons of this day is that, like it or not, pride is at the foundation perhaps of all sin. Virtually all, anyway. It is pride that motivates us to reject God's commands. It is pride that makes us stiffnecked and hardheaded. It leads us to say, "Well, here is the way I see it." It moves us to think that there is a better way, a short cut, for our desires of the moment. "There is a way that seems right to a man, but the end thereof are the ways of death." Pride is even at the root of our ignorance because it leads us to not see God, because, after all, who needs Him? I just had a commentary last week where the man said, "God is not necessary. Who needs Him? The creation can create itself as long as there is a law of gravity." That is what that learned man said. When we add to this that mankind's first sin involved food, it adds an interesting dimension to this day. Food plays a major role in our life. First of all, we greatly desire it because it tastes good, and added to that is that without it we die. It is a necessity for life. Is it possible that God commanded fasting on this day to remind us of that, and to make us understand that we can humble ourselves to sacrifice something so needed for life, and that fasting shows us we can control our drive, our passion, and our desires to submit even in a life-threatening circumstance? Jesus did it for 40 days. Elijah did it for 40 days. Samuel fasted for 21 days. Moses fasted for 40 days twice! If those men could do it, why cannot we fast for one day? It gives you some sort of an idea of how merciful God is. He only requires one day a year, but in other places in the Bible He encourages us through these examples to fast more times by voluntarily doing it. There is only one time in the year that we are to eat unleavened bread. It is only one time in the year that we are to be in booths, but each of these occasions has a tremendously valuable lesson within it. He is not a God who puts His people through agony willingly on an occasion such as this. Brethren, we can control ourselves with the help of God, and if we are willing to give up food, which is an absolutely necessary thing for life and a sense of well-being, cannot we stop ourselves from sinning over something that is just our pleasure for the moment? We can. That is the lesson that goes with fasting on this day. Food played a part in the first sin. Denying food plays a part in coming out of sin. What is it we have to do as our part of being at one with God? We have to submit to Him. It is a simple statement, but it is not always easy, but it is what we have to do in the keeping of our part of the covenant. The Bible contains some very succinct advise in what it is that keeps us from submitting. It is pride, but here is what we need to do. Notice how this section begins.
Grace is not only the forgiveness of sin, it also stands for all the gifts of God by which He enables us to keep His commands.
There is an awful lot there which we will not go into at this time.
Our part in settling the disagreements with, and therefore the separation from God, is to be humble before Him. Why humility? Because it requires a beating down of pride that springs forth to make us seek our pleasure through sin. Why submit to God in humility? Because what God tells us to do is right. God is right in everything, and that is something that the great bulk of Israel simply would not do. They responded with hard heads and stiff necks, and both of those terms in biblical imagery portray resistance to God. Let us go to Philippians 2, and we will finish on this example from Jesus Christ.
There is our example—someone who is much, much higher than we are in every way, but He submitted to God in everything. He Himself gave testimony that He always did whatever pleased the Father. All the time He did that. Fasting is just a reminder that we are humbling ourselves. If we will humble ourselves all through our lifetime, we will be exalted just as Jesus Christ has been, because we too will be pointing our direction in life to submitting to God in everything. | |||||||||||||||
© Copyright 2002-2012 Church of the Great God. Contact Us. | |||||||||||||||